Anthropic vs OpenAI vs Gemini

Three frontier model providers head-to-head — pick the one whose model family and pricing model fits the workload you're actually shipping.

Anthropic Claude

AI safety company building reliable, interpretable AI

Visit website

See alternatives →

OpenAI

Building safe AGI that benefits all of humanity

Visit website

See alternatives →

Gemini

Google's frontier LLM family, available in Pro, Ultra, and Nano variants for chat, API access, and Google Workspace integration

Visit website

See alternatives →

Our take

Pick Anthropic when complex-instruction-following, agentic workflows, and long-context reasoning dominate the workload. Pick OpenAI when ecosystem breadth — SDK maturity, structured outputs, image generation, and the deepest tools surface — matters more than any single benchmark. Pick Gemini when native multimodality across audio and video, or tight Google Workspace and Cloud integration, drives the call.

How we evaluate →

Get the next comparison in your inbox

Weekly digest — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

At a Glance

Attribute	Anthropic Claude	OpenAI	Gemini
Category	AI / ML	AI / ML	AI / ML
Pricing Model	freemium	freemium	freemium
Starting Price	Free	Free	Free
Free Tier	Yes	Yes	Yes
Open Source	No	No	No
Platforms	web, api	web, api	—

Community Popularity

Anthropic Claude

OpenAI

Gemini

Key Features

Anthropic Claude

Claude chat completions
tool use
prompt caching
vision input
extended thinking
computer use
batch processing

OpenAI

Pros & Cons

Anthropic Claude

Pros

Claude's instruction-following on complex, multi-step prompts is consistently more reliable than GPT-4 for structured output tasks+172
The 200K context window on Claude 3 makes processing entire codebases or long documents practical without chunking strategies+158
Claude's code generation quality is exceptional — it writes idiomatic, well-structured code with proper error handling more often than not+143
The model is noticeably less likely to fabricate citations or make confident false claims — safer to use in user-facing summarization features+128
API pricing for Claude Haiku is extremely competitive for high-volume use cases where response quality just needs to be good, not perfect

More comparisons featuring Anthropic Claude

OpenAI vs Anthropic

Anthropic vs Gemini

Anthropic vs Cohere

More comparisons featuring OpenAI

Looking for alternatives?

OpenAI

Pros

The API is the most reliable and fastest in production of any frontier model provider — consistent latency under load+189
GPT-4o is genuinely capable across a huge range of tasks including code, analysis, and vision without requiring model-specific prompting tricks+174
The ecosystem of libraries, tutorials, and third-party integrations built around OpenAI's API is unmatched — every framework has an OpenAI adapter+158
Function calling and structured outputs make it practical to integrate LLM responses into typed TypeScript applications reliably+143
The Assistants API with file search and code interpreter handles complex RAG use cases without building your own vector database setup+128

Cons

Pricing for GPT-4 class models is high enough that a popular app with heavy AI usage can burn through thousands of dollars quickly+186
Vendor dependency on a single company for a critical product feature is risky — rate limits and outages have impacted production apps+162
Context window costs mean long conversations or large document analysis gets expensive fast compared to alternatives like Gemini Flash+138
The Assistants API is complex and has inconsistent behavior — many teams end up building their own simpler orchestration layer on top of the Chat API+112

See full review of OpenAI→

Anthropic vs OpenAI vs Gemini

At a Glance

Community Popularity

Key Features

Pros & Cons

More comparisons featuring Anthropic Claude

More comparisons featuring OpenAI

Looking for alternatives?

More comparisons featuring Gemini