MongoDB Atlas vs Supabase

Document NoSQL versus relational Postgres — the schema decision shapes how you'll model data, query it, and evolve it for years.

MongoDB Atlas

Fully managed cloud database for modern applications

Visit website

See alternatives →

Supabase

The open source Firebase alternative with Postgres

Visit website

See alternatives →

Our take

Pick MongoDB Atlas when your data is genuinely document-shaped — nested, varying per record, evolving fast — and joins aren't core to the workload. Pick Supabase when relational integrity, SQL ergonomics, and row-level security matter, or when you want auth and storage bundled in the same platform.

How we evaluate →

Get the next comparison in your inbox

Weekly digest — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

At a Glance

Attribute	MongoDB Atlas	Supabase
Category	Database	Database
Pricing Model	freemium	freemium
Starting Price	Free / $57/mo	Free / $25/mo
Free Tier	Yes	Yes
Open Source	No	Yes
Platforms	aws, gcp, azure	web, postgres, edge

Community Popularity

MongoDB Atlas

Supabase

Key Features

MongoDB Atlas

managed MongoDB
global clusters
Atlas Search
vector search
data lake
triggers
charts

Supabase

Pros & Cons

MongoDB Atlas

Pros

The flexible document model means you can iterate on your data shape in early product development without migrations+132
Atlas Search gives you full-text search with relevance ranking built directly into your database without a separate service+118
The aggregation pipeline is incredibly powerful once you learn it — complex transformations that would require joins in SQL are often one pipeline stage+104
Global clusters with regional reads and writes let you build truly multi-region apps without managing replication yourself+89

Cons

Schema-less sounds great until you have inconsistent data across millions of documents and no enforcement to help you find the problem

More comparisons featuring Supabase

Database

Supabase vs Firebase

Supabasevs

Firebase

Database

Supabase vs Firebase vs PlanetScale

Supabasevs

Firebasevs

PlanetScale

Database

Supabase vs Neon

Supabasevs

Neon

Looking for alternatives?

Supabase

Pros

Postgres under the hood means you can use any standard SQL tool and your existing knowledge transfers directly+187
The free tier is genuinely generous — 500MB database and 2GB storage is enough to validate most SaaS ideas without spending a cent+164
Row-level security policies are built in, so you can ship a secure multi-tenant app without writing custom auth middleware+142
Auto-generated TypeScript types from your schema save hours every week and eliminate an entire class of runtime bugs+138
Storage, auth, edge functions, and database all in one dashboard — I stopped juggling six different services+121
The realtime subscriptions work out of the box and don't require any extra infrastructure like a separate Pusher account+97

Cons

Hitting the connection limit on the free tier (60 connections) will silently fail your app at the worst possible moment under load+178
Self-hosting is technically possible but the documentation is scattered and keeping up with upstream changes is a maintenance burden+112
Edge functions have a cold start delay that makes them unsuitable for latency-sensitive operations without warm-up tricks+98
The dashboard UI has had confusing UX regressions after updates that made simple tasks like inspecting RLS policies harder to find+89
Branching for database preview environments is still immature compared to Neon — you can't easily spin up a branch per PR+74

See full review of Supabase→