PlanetScale vs Prisma

At a Glance

PlanetScale

Prisma

PlanetScale

Prisma

No features listed.

PlanetScale

Pros

Branching model for database schema changes means you never run a raw ALTER TABLE in production again — a game changer for team workflows+183
Zero-downtime schema migrations are solved by default — no more 3am maintenance windows for adding a column+162
Vitess under the hood means it handles enormous write throughput that would kill a vanilla Postgres setup+147
The query insights dashboard identifies slow queries with execution plans before they become production incidents+109

Cons

They killed the free tier in 2024 and the cheapest plan is $39/mo — hard to justify for early-stage projects that might not survive

Database

Supabase vs Firebase vs PlanetScale

Database

PlanetScale vs Neon

Database

Supabase vs Neon vs PlanetScale

Get the next comparison in your inbox

Weekly digest — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Prisma

Pros

The schema definition language generates migrations, types, and a query client — it's the closest thing to a full ORM DX that TypeScript has+191
Auto-completion in VS Code for Prisma queries is genuinely the best ORM IDE experience I've used in any language+167
Type-safe queries eliminate an entire category of runtime errors that would otherwise only surface in production+154
The Prisma Studio GUI lets non-technical teammates browse and edit data without learning SQL or touching the database directly+138
Migration history tracked as SQL files in version control means your database evolution is always reviewable and auditable+119

Cons

Prisma Client performance under heavy load is noticeably slower than raw SQL or lighter ORMs like Drizzle due to the query engine overhead+162
The query engine is a binary that has to be downloaded per platform — this causes deployment issues with exotic architectures and Lambda layers+141
Complex queries that Prisma can't express force you to drop into raw SQL, which breaks the type-safety you were relying on+127
Migration conflicts in teams with multiple developers working on the schema simultaneously are painful to resolve manually+89