Polar vs Lemon Squeezy

At a Glance

Polar

Lemon Squeezy

Polar

Lemon Squeezy

Polar

Pros

Zero fees on the free tier for open source projects — finally a payments tool designed with OSS maintainers in mind+154
The GitHub integration lets backers sponsor your repo directly from the README which lowers the friction for OSS donations+138
Fully open source, so you can self-host or audit the code — no black box in your payment infrastructure+112
Issue funding lets users back specific bugs or features, which is a creative way to prioritize work based on community demand+97

Cons

Payout availability is still limited to certain countries and US-based founders have fewer friction issues than international ones

Payments

Stripe vs Paddle vs Lemon Squeezy

Payments

Stripe vs Lemon Squeezy

Get the next comparison in your inbox

Weekly digest — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Lemon Squeezy

Pros

Setup takes literally under an hour for a digital product or SaaS subscription — the simplest checkout experience I've found+163
Acts as merchant of record like Paddle, so all VAT and global tax compliance is handled without extra work+148
The built-in affiliate program lets customers refer others and earn commission without any external tool+127
License key generation for software products is built in and works great for desktop apps and plugins+109

Cons

Limited customization for the checkout flow — you can't deeply brand the experience the way Stripe Elements allows+134
Payout schedule delays mean your money can sit for two weeks before reaching your bank account+118
Analytics and reporting are basic — you'll want a separate tool for any meaningful cohort or retention analysis+87
Complex subscription scenarios like usage-based pricing or multi-seat plans require workarounds that feel hacky+76