SvelteKit vs Remix

At a Glance

SvelteKit

Remix

SvelteKit

Pros

Svelte's compile-step approach produces the smallest client bundle of any major framework — less JavaScript shipped means faster pages+172
The reactivity model is so simple that you can onboard developers who've never used Svelte in a single afternoon+158
Form actions are the cleanest implementation of server mutations in any web framework — progressive enhancement comes for free+143
The file-based routing with layout inheritance is intuitive and doesn't require any configuration to get right+129

Cons

The smaller ecosystem means some UI component libraries, auth solutions, and integrations aren't as mature as their React equivalents

Framework

Next.js vs SvelteKit

Framework

Astro vs SvelteKit

Framework

Next.js vs Remix vs SvelteKit

Get the next comparison in your inbox

Weekly digest — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Remix

Pros

Nested routes with per-route data loading and error boundaries are the best model for building complex UIs with proper loading states+167
Built on web standards — Fetch, FormData, and Response — which means skills transfer to other platforms and the code is more portable+152
Progressive enhancement is built into the framework — forms work without JavaScript and hydration happens on top, not instead+138
Error handling with per-route error boundaries means a broken section of your app doesn't crash the entire page+117

Cons

The mental model for data loading, actions, and the form-based mutation pattern takes longer to internalize than Next.js conventions+143
Community size is significantly smaller than Next.js and finding Remix-specific examples for complex scenarios takes more digging+119
Hosting options are more limited — Remix works best on platforms that support long-running servers rather than pure serverless+94