Drizzle ORM vs Supabase

At a Glance

Drizzle ORM

Supabase

Drizzle ORM

No features listed.

Supabase

Drizzle ORM

Pros

Query performance is very close to raw SQL because there's no separate query engine — it compiles directly to SQL strings+173
The schema definition in TypeScript gives you type-safe queries without the overhead of a separate binary or language+159
Bundle size is tiny compared to Prisma, which matters a lot when you're deploying to Cloudflare Workers with strict size limits+148
You write SQL-like syntax that maps one-to-one with what hits the database, so debugging unexpected queries is much easier+134
Supports multiple databases including Postgres, MySQL, and SQLite with the same API — useful for monorepos with different environments+112

Database

Prisma vs Drizzle

Database

Supabase vs Firebase

Database

Supabase vs Firebase vs PlanetScale

Get the next comparison in your inbox

Weekly digest — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Cons

Documentation has gaps and some advanced use cases require reading GitHub issues or the source code to understand+108
The ORM is still relatively young and some features like soft deletes and complex relations require more boilerplate than Prisma+97
Error messages when queries fail can be cryptic and don't point to the line in your code that caused the problem+81
No GUI like Prisma Studio — you need a separate tool like TablePlus or pgAdmin to inspect and edit data visually+76

Supabase

Pros

Postgres under the hood means you can use any standard SQL tool and your existing knowledge transfers directly+187
The free tier is genuinely generous — 500MB database and 2GB storage is enough to validate most SaaS ideas without spending a cent+164
Row-level security policies are built in, so you can ship a secure multi-tenant app without writing custom auth middleware+142
Auto-generated TypeScript types from your schema save hours every week and eliminate an entire class of runtime bugs+138
Storage, auth, edge functions, and database all in one dashboard — I stopped juggling six different services+121
The realtime subscriptions work out of the box and don't require any extra infrastructure like a separate Pusher account+97

Cons

Hitting the connection limit on the free tier (60 connections) will silently fail your app at the worst possible moment under load+178
Self-hosting is technically possible but the documentation is scattered and keeping up with upstream changes is a maintenance burden+112
Edge functions have a cold start delay that makes them unsuitable for latency-sensitive operations without warm-up tricks+98
The dashboard UI has had confusing UX regressions after updates that made simple tasks like inspecting RLS policies harder to find+89
Branching for database preview environments is still immature compared to Neon — you can't easily spin up a branch per PR+74